One hears recently that we suffer from "cultural exhaustion," which is alleged to be one reason why the West is on the decline. I think another problem is "cultural confusion."
This is the personal website and blog of James Otteson. It contains information about his career, education, scholarship, professional activities, and perhaps a word or two about his personal life. Thank you for visiting! This site's contents are © James R. Otteson PhD 2009-2013. All rights reserved.
29 June 2010
18 June 2010
The Mysterious Mystery of the Tea Party
There are some awfully strange theories out there attempting to explain the deep mystery of the recent Tea Party movement. But I don't think it's really all that mysterious.
13 June 2010
Selves and Rants
Two items today:
1. People speak with different voices that represent their various selves. Because it communicates no context, however, the information the internet conveys is flat. That can give us the impression that everything anyone says in any context is equally representative of his entire character. But that is a false impression. Thus I think we should be very hesitant before we condemn anyone's character on the basis of a single utterance or sentence, or even a handfull of utterances.
2. A series of "rants" on impatient drivers, bicyclists, medical students talking out of school, sexual exhibitionism, and the importance of reserving our moral outrage for things that are truly morally outrageous.
10 June 2010
Singer to World: Drop Dead
Peter Singer argues that we should consider sterilizing ourselves so that we are the last generation of humans on earth. No, he's not kidding.
03 June 2010
Authority and Opinion
If Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana, has actions he is willing and able to take to address the Gulf oil spill, and the only thing stopping him is that he doesn't have President Obama's permission, then, why, he should by all means sally forth.
02 June 2010
Rand and Marx
The recent publication of two biographies of Ayn Rand has rekindled interest in her, and it has also rekindled interest in a by-now standard roster of criticisms of her and her work. As this article rehearses, Rand's work is superficial at best and fraudulent at worst, and it therefore appeals only to immature minds and to some of our basest instincts--which explains why her work is largely not taken seriously in the academy, for example.
By contrast, Karl Marx's work is taken quite seriously. Yet do, or perhaps should, some of the same criticisms leveled at Rand apply also to Marx's work?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)